<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Field Recording&#187; sky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.happyorange.org.uk/tag/sky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.happyorange.org.uk</link>
	<description>Field recording, aircraft, sound and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:37:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>48Kbps AAC+ and 160Kbps OGG Vorbis Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.happyorange.org.uk/2009/48kbps-aac-and-160kbps-ogg-vorbis-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.happyorange.org.uk/2009/48kbps-aac-and-160kbps-ogg-vorbis-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jhuckle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[phonography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sci-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio compression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital recording quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spotify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.happyorange.org.uk/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a small sample group, CNET have concluded that that people cannot tell the difference between Sky&#8217;s streaming audio at 48Kbps AAC+ and Spotify&#8217;s use of 160Kbps OGG Vorbis. I spend a lot of time any money making sure I get equipment that records at the highest rates and greatest depth &#8211; much of this definition is then thrown away when distilling down [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a small sample group, <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/digitalmusic/0,39029432,49303980,00.htm">CNET have concluded</a> that that people cannot tell the difference between Sky&#8217;s streaming audio at 48Kbps AAC+ and Spotify&#8217;s use of 160Kbps OGG Vorbis.</p>
<p><span id="more-767"></span></p>
<p>I spend a lot of time any money making sure I get equipment that records at the highest rates and greatest depth &#8211; much of this definition is then thrown away when distilling down into mp3.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="padding: 6px;" title="CNET Audio Shootout" src="http://www.cnet.co.uk/i/c/blg/cat/digitalmusic/skyvsspotify.jpg" alt="" width="164" height="101" />Reading about what other recordists think and do, recording at inaudible frequencies is to enable a record to be made that can be used in the future using future tools and devices &#8211; considering this and the fact that compressed audio is &#8216;stickier&#8217; (easily stored, easily interpreted), what is the point of high quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.happyorange.org.uk/2009/48kbps-aac-and-160kbps-ogg-vorbis-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

